We benchmark the quality of compute across providers and help it transact.
What we doIt's underappreciated how much compute quality varies, and that matters more than ever now that hundreds of new GPU providers are coming online. We're building an open benchmark for compute quality.
Published GPU specifications generalize across silicon and often overlook details that matter in practice, like the silicon lottery, heterogeneous power and networking setups, or cooling. We measure nodes in the context of what they're supposed to do, covering both bare-metal performance and managed clusters. Measurements include synchronized training steps, collective communication, sustained matmul throughput, and checkpoint I/O under load.
Our checks measure every node against a baseline tailored to that specific GPU rather than a threshold copied off a datasheet, then go deeper into fleet-specific health. We catch stragglers before one slow rank sets the pace of a synchronized job, attribute slowdowns to the component responsible, and flag a card that is merely below par as clearly as one that is broken.
We provide coverage across NVIDIA and AMD, on Slurm, Kubernetes, or plain SSH, for testing at handoff, burn-in, and periodic recertification.
If you run GPUs, pay for them, or finance them and want an independent read on how they actually perform, get in touch. If you're a neocloud with a view on how compute benchmarks should be defined, we'd like to hear from you too.